APICES acknowledged in PARASEC study
APICES has been acknowledged for its contribution to PARASEC, a retrospective analysis of treatment patterns in Spanish prostate cancer patients treated with darolutamide in the ARAMIS trial, presented at ASCO GU 2025.

APICES acknowledged in PARASEC study

APICES is pleased to share that our team has been acknowledged in the PARASEC study, a retrospective prostate cancer study presented at the ASCO GU 2025 Congress and published as a Journal of Clinical Oncology meeting abstract.

In PARASEC, investigators describe subsequent treatment patterns in Spanish prostate cancer patients who received darolutamide in the ARAMIS trial, reflecting standard clinical practice in Spain.

APICES collaborated across multiple activities, including study start-up, project management, monitoring, biostatistics, and medical writing. We would like to thank Bayer and Dr. Javier Puente for the opportunity to contribute and to be included in the acknowledgments, and we congratulate all investigators on the successful completion of this project.

APICES acknowledged in PARASEC study — APICES CRO

You can find further information in the following link: Treatment patterns in prostate cancer patients who received darolutamide in the ARAMIS trial in Spain: PARASEC study. | Journal of Clinical Oncology 

Get the latest clinical insights delivered to your feed or inbox!

EU MDR Clinical Investigations: Article 62 and Article 82 Pathways Explained (2026)

EU MDR Clinical Investigations: Article 62 and Article 82 Pathways Explained (2026)

EU MDR clinical investigation requirements have fundamentally changed how Medtech sponsors plan and execute device studies in Europe. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 replaced the clinical investigation provisions of Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD) and introduced a more stringent, harmonised framework across all 27 EU member states. For sponsors running investigations in Spain, Germany, France, the Netherlands, or any other member state, understanding which pathway applies to their study is the single most consequential regulatory decision before CIP submission.