APICES Acknowledged for its Role in GEOCP-SEOR Study 
Stage III NSCLC care sits at the intersection of multimodal treatment and real-world constraints. The GEOCP-SEOR population-based study describes how patients are managed across Spain, and APICES was acknowledged for supporting the publication through medical editorial assistance.

APICES Acknowledged for its Role in GEOCP-SEOR Study 

APICES CRO is pleased to announce its contribution to the GEOCP-SEOR study. This is a RWE Study in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), recently featured in the Cancers Journal

The study evaluates and provide real-world insights into the management of non-small cell lung cancer stage III (NSCLC-SIII) in Spain. 

APICES contributed to the study through medical editorial assistance. The work of Fernando Rico-Villademoros, and Juan Luis Sanz, along with the broader Spanish team, has been instrumental in the success of this project. 

We also acknowledge AstraZeneca Spain and Paloma Sosa Fajardo for the collaboration and opportunity to contribute to this important study advancing treatment options in oncology. 

APICES Acknowledged for its Role in GEOCP-SEOR Study — APICES CRO

For further information about the GEOCP-SEOR Study, please read the full scientific publication following the link: Stage III NSCLC Treatment Patterns in Spain: A Population-Based Study of the GOECP-SEOR 

Get the latest clinical insights delivered to your feed or inbox!

EU MDR Clinical Investigations: Article 62 and Article 82 Pathways Explained (2026)

EU MDR Clinical Investigations: Article 62 and Article 82 Pathways Explained (2026)

EU MDR clinical investigation requirements have fundamentally changed how Medtech sponsors plan and execute device studies in Europe. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 replaced the clinical investigation provisions of Directive 93/42/EEC (MDD) and introduced a more stringent, harmonised framework across all 27 EU member states. For sponsors running investigations in Spain, Germany, France, the Netherlands, or any other member state, understanding which pathway applies to their study is the single most consequential regulatory decision before CIP submission.